Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Is there anything wrong with American healthcare?

Healthcare reform is the topic d’été in America. In this post I will outline some of what is perceived to be wrong with the American healthcare system.

First, however, I’d like to thank Dana for inviting me to post to her blog. In the interest of full disclosure, I do have conflicts of interest. I am a patient, physician and American citizen who is suffering from and profiting from the current system and has much to gain and/or to lose with healthcare reform. I am not an expert, but I attempt to be an informed patient/physician/citizen.

So what is wrong? Most of the current debate focuses on the broad themes of coverage, cost and quality. In this post, I will focus on coverage and cost. I will save quality for a future post.

Let’s start with coverage. Approximately 15% of Americans are uninsured (figure 1). This equates to approximately 45 million Americans or more than the entire populations of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Hawaii and Alaska combined (2008 US Census Bureau estimates). Further, the number of uninsured continues to grow. In our system, unlike other industrialized nations, most workers rely on employers for access to affordable health insurance. With this employer-based model, accessibility to insurance is rapidly decreasing with rising unemployment (figure 2). So without intervention, at least in the short term, the ranks of the uninsured will grow with the ranks of the unemployed.

Figure 1


Figure 2


Now let’s move to cost. The United States spends more per capita on healthcare than any other industrialized nation (without significant outcome improvements, but that is to be addressed in the quality post) (figure 3). Healthcare spending continues to rise quickly. Current healthcare spending represents nearly 17% of gross domestic product, up from 5% in 1960 and 12% in 1990 (http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/).

Figure 3


Over the past decade while wages have increased by 34%, healthcare premiums have increased by 119%, more than eliminating any wage advancement (figure 4). In fact, >60% of all personal bankruptcies in 2007 had a healthcare cause (Himmelstein et al. Am J Med. 2009 Jun 4).

Figure 4


In addition to hurting workers, healthcare costs are burdensome to American businesses. Employer contributions to healthcare costs have increased by 117% over the past decade (figure 5). A recent Rand Corp. report examined 38 industries and found an inverse-relationship between industry growth and employee healthcare coverage, not accounted for by other industry factors (Sood N et al. HSR: Health Services Research. Epub June 9 2009). The Business Roundtable (made up of CEOs of America’s largest businesses) are also calling for healthcare reform, noting American businesses pay on average $0.73 more per hour per worker for healthcare benefits than their competitors in other G-5 countries (http://www.businessroundtable.org).

Figure 5


Further, healthcare costs are burdensome on government. Over 45% of all American healthcare costs are footed by government programs (figure 6). Medicare and Medicaid/SCHIP spending will account for 21% of 2010 federal spending, more than either Social Security or defense spending (figure 7). Medicare Part A, while widely popular, is projected to be insolvent by 2017 (http://www.cms.hhs.gov/reportstrustfunds/downloads/tr2009.pdf). Nearly every state in the union is also struggling with Medicaid costs.

Figure 6


Figure 7


So in summary, the ranks of the uninsured are growing and may soon reach 1 in 5 Americans. At the same time that we are losing ground in insurance coverage, healthcare costs are skyrocketing, fast out-pacing wage increases and inflation. Healthcare costs are crippling and unsustainable for workers, employers and government.

I refer you to the following websites (only a few of many) for more information on the problems facing the American healthcare system.

http://healthcarereform.nejm.org
http://www.healthreform.gov
http://www.kff.org
http://www.lewin.com
http://www.rand.org/research_areas/health/
http://www.businessroundtable.org/initiatives/health

Please check back in the coming weeks for posts on how American healthcare got here, the quality of American healthcare, proposed healthcare solutions, the cost of change, the major players, the political dimensions of healthcare reform, what you can do and more. Let the dialogue begin!

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

no solutions? :(

dana. said...

This will be a series of topics related to healthcare reform so we can educate ourselves first on what the confluence of issues are, arguments of both sides, what the proposed legislation is and then solutions will be determined by reader because now you and other readers will have actual empirical data and fact rather than rhetoric and fear. However, the last of the series will be, "what can be done?". Stay tuned and I encourage dialogue hrough question and comment. Dana.

Blue said...

Dana, are you the author? or is the person posting also named Dana? or is someone posting from your account? I'd love an introduction. And while I can't claim any insight on this issue, I really appreciated the starting point of this discussion. It was very useful in forming in the beginnings of an understanding with what's going on with this whole issue.

My FIL sent this to me in an email the other day, which I'll leave with you.

"Obama's health care plan will be written by a committee whose head, John Conyers, says he doesn't understand it. It'll be passed by Congress that has not read it, signed by a president who smokes, funded by a Treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, overseen by a Surgeon General who is obese, and financed by a country that's nearly broke. What could possibly go wrong?" –Rush

Jed Brinton said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jed Brinton said...

Hmmm ... I guess I'll start by addressing the first issue of coverage, which seems like a pretty simple one. It is more complicated than a single number (usually given as between 40 and 50 million as in this case), though.

Here's a brief rundown of several problems with using that number (such as that many of those people could purchase health care but choose not to, and that another chunk qualify under current government programs but choose not to use them): http://nrinstitute.org/mediamalpractice/?p=134. They conclude that a better number would be close to 10 million.

A longer discussion by the purportedly non-partisan FactCheck admits most of those same points while adding (and admitting) the point that the uninsured group still receives billions of dollars worth of healthcare annually http://www.factcheck.org/2009/06./the-real-uninsured/. I have found them to be liberal-leaning in the past on issues where I actually had some special knowledge, so I'm not surprised that in the end they deny that the combination of the points adds up to a 50% reduction in the total number.

Anonymous said...

I am curious to know if the author of this blog is american or canadian. That fact alone makes a big difference.

dana. said...

I am the owner of the blog, and I am Canadian. The authour of the series on healthcare reform is an American. What is the reason for the difference in your mind?

Thanks.

sassy politico said...

I am the author of the above blog. I am working to post the next entry on healthcare reform here. In the meantime, you can read it at http://sassypolitico.blogspot.com/.

The next entry discusses what to listen for in President Obama's healthcare reform talk scheduled for tomorrow (Wed Sep 9) at 8PM EST.